The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) is an IQ test designed to measure intelligence and cognitive ability in adults and older adolescents.[1] The original WAIS (Form I) was published in February 1955 by David Wechsler, as a revision of the Wechsler–Bellevue Intelligence Scale, released in 1939.[2] It is currently in its fourth edition (WAIS-IV) released in 2008 by Pearson, and is the most widely used IQ test, for both adults and older adolescents, in the world.
History[edit]
The WAIS is founded on Wechsler’s definition of intelligence, which he defined as “… the global capacity of a person to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his environment.”[3] He believed that intelligence was made up of specific elements that could be isolated, defined, and subsequently measured. However, these individual elements were not entirely independent, but were all interrelated. His argument, in other words, is that general intelligence is composed of various specific and interrelated functions or elements that can be individually measured.[4]
This theory differed greatly from the Binet scale which, in Wechsler’s day, was generally considered the supreme authority with regard to intelligence testing. A drastically revised new version of the Binet scale, released in 1937, received a great deal of criticism from David Wechsler (after whom the original Wechsler–Bellevue Intelligence scale and the modern Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV are named).[4]
- Wechsler was a very influential advocate for the concept of non-intellective factors, and he felt that the 1937 Binet scale did not do a good job of incorporating these factors into the scale (non-intellective factors are variables that contribute to the overall score in intelligence, but are not made up of intelligence-related items. These include things such as lack of confidence, fear of failure, attitudes, etc.).
- Wechsler did not agree with the idea of a single score that the Binet test gave.[4]
- Wechsler argued that the Binet scale items were not valid for adult test-takers because the items were chosen specifically for use with children.[4]
- The “Binet scale’s emphasis on speed, with timed tasks scattered throughout the scale, tended to unduly handicap older adults.”[4]
- Wechsler believed that “mental age norms clearly did not apply to adults.”[4]
- Wechsler criticized the then existing Binet scale because “it did not consider that intellectual performance could deteriorate as a person grew older.”[4]
These criticisms of the 1937 Binet test helped produce the Wechsler–Bellevue scale, released in 1939. However, the present-day WAIS-IV has contradicted many of these criticisms, by incorporating a single overall score, using multiple timed tasks, focusing on intellective items and other ways. While this scale has been revised (resulting in the present day WAIS-IV), many of the original concepts Wechsler argued for, have become standards in psychological testing, including the point-scale concept and the performance-scale concept.[4]
Wechsler–Bellevue Intelligence Scale[edit]
The Wechsler–Bellevue tests were innovative in the 1930s because they:
- gathered tasks created for nonclinical purposes for administration as a “clinical test battery”,[5]
- used the point scale concept instead of the age scale, and
- included a non-verbal performance scale.[6][7]
Point scale concept[edit]
In the Binet scales (prior to the 1986 version) items were grouped according to age level. Each of these age levels was composed of a group of tasks that could be passed by two-thirds to three-quarters of the individuals in that level. This meant that items were not arranged according to content. Additionally, an individual taking a Binet test would only receive credit if a certain number of the tasks were completed. This meant that falling short just one task required for the credit, resulted in no credit at all (for example, if passing three out of four tasks was required to receive credit, then passing two yielded no credit).[4]
The point scale concept significantly changed the way testing was done by assigning credits or points to each item. This had two large effects. First, this allowed items to be grouped according to content. Second, participants were able to receive a set number of points or credits for each item passed.[8] The result was a test that could be made up of different content areas (or subtests) with both an overall score and a score for each content area. In turn, this allowed for an analysis to be made of an individual’s ability in a variety of content areas (as opposed to one general score).[4]
The Non-Verbal Performance Scale[edit]
The non-verbal performance scale was also a critical difference from the Binet scale. The earlier Binet scale had been persistently and consistently criticized for its emphasis on language and verbal skills.[4] Wechsler designed an entire scale that allowed the measurement of non-verbal intelligence. This became known as a performance scale. This scale required a subject to actively do something, such as copying symbols or pointing to a missing detail in a picture, rather than just answering questions. This was an important development, as it attempted to overcome biases that were caused by “language, culture, and education.”[4] Further, this scale also provided an opportunity to observe a different type of behavior, because something physical was required. Clinicians were able to observe how a participant reacted to the “longer interval of sustained effort, concentration, and attention” that the performance tasks required.[4]
As the Wechsler–Bellevue scale was the first to effectively use the performance scale, it also introduced the “possibility of directly comparing an individual’s verbal and nonverbal intelligence”.[4] This was possible as “the results of both scales were expressed in comparable units”.[4] The Binet scale did have performance tasks, but they were geared toward younger children. The Wechsler-Bellevue was also unique in that there were entire tests that were considered supplements or alternatives, including “performance” measures such as the Leiter International Performance Scale.[4]
WAIS[edit]
The WAIS was initially created as a revision of the Wechsler–Bellevue Intelligence Scale (WBIS), which was a battery of tests published by Wechsler in 1939. The WBIS was composed of subtests that could be found in various other intelligence tests of the time, such as Robert Yerkes‘ army testing program and the Binet–Simon scale. The WAIS was first released in February 1955 by David Wechsler. Because the Wechsler tests included non-verbal items (known as performance scales) as well as verbal items for all test-takers, and because the 1960 form of Lewis Terman‘s Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales was less carefully developed than previous versions, Form I of the WAIS surpassed the Stanford–Binet tests in popularity by the 1960s.[2]
WAIS-R[edit]
The WAIS-R, a revised form of the WAIS, was released in 1981 and consisted of six verbal and five performance subtests. The verbal tests were: Information, Comprehension, Arithmetic, Digit Span, Similarities, and Vocabulary. The Performance subtests were: Picture Arrangement, Picture Completion, Block Design, Object Assembly, and Digit Symbol. A verbal IQ, performance IQ and full scale IQ were obtained.[9]
This revised edition did not provide new validity data, but used the data from the original WAIS; however new norms were provided, carefully stratified.[9]
WAIS-III[edit]
The WAIS-III, a subsequent revision of the WAIS and the WAIS-R, was released in 1997. It provided scores for Verbal IQ, Performance IQ, and Full Scale IQ, along with four secondary indices (Verbal Comprehension, Working Memory, Perceptual Organization, and Processing Speed).
Verbal IQ (VIQ)[edit]
Included seven tests and provided two sub-indices; verbal comprehension and working memory.
The Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) included the following tests:
- Information
- Similarities
- Vocabulary
The Working Memory Index (WMI) included:
- Arithmetic
- Digit Span
- Letter-Number-Sequencing
Subtest(s) not included in the sub-indices:
- Comprehension
Supplementary subtest(s) (Only to be used for total VIQ index scoring and specified sub-index):
- Letter-Number-Sequencing
Performance IQ (PIQ)[edit]
Included six tests and it also provided two sub-indices; perceptual organization and processing speed.
The Perceptual Organization Index (POI) included:
- Block Design
- Matrix Reasoning
- Picture Completion
The Processing Speed Index (PSI) included:
- Digit Symbol-Coding
- Symbol Search
Subtest(s) not included in the sub-indices:
- Picture Arrangement
Supplementary subtests (Only to be used for total PIQ index scoring and specified sub-index):
- Object Assembly
- Symbol Search
WAIS-IV[edit]
This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2016)
|
The current version of the test, the WAIS-IV, which was released in 2008, is composed of 10 core subtests and five supplemental subtests, with the 10 core subtests yielding scaled scores that sum to derive the Full Scale IQ. With the WAIS-IV, the verbal/performance IQ scores from previous versions were removed and replaced by the index scores. The General Ability Index (GAI) was included, which consists of the Similarities, Vocabulary and Information subtests from the Verbal Comprehension Index and the Block Design, Matrix Reasoning and Visual Puzzles subtests from the Perceptual Reasoning Index. The GAI is clinically useful because it can be used as a measure of cognitive abilities that are less vulnerable to impairments of processing speed and working memory.
Index scores and scales[edit]
There are four index scores representing major components of intelligence:
- Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)
- Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)
- Working Memory Index (WMI)
- Processing Speed Index (PSI)
Two broad scores, which can be used to summarize general intellectual ability, can also be derived:
- Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), based on the total combined performance of the VCI, PRI, WMI, and PSI
- General Ability Index (GAI), based only on the six subtests that the VCI and PRI comprise.
Index | Subtest | Core? | Description | Proposed abilities measured |
---|---|---|---|---|
Verbal Comprehension | Similarities | Describe how two words or concepts are similar. | Abstract verbal reasoning; semantic knowledge | |
Vocabulary | Name objects in pictures or define words presented to them. | Semantic knowledge; verbal comprehension and expression | ||
Information | General knowledge questions | Degree of general information acquired from culture | ||
Comprehension | Questions about social situations or common concepts. | Ability to express abstract social conventions, rules and expressions | ||
Perceptual Reasoning | Block Design | Put together red-and-white blocks in a pattern according to a displayed model. This is timed, and some of the more difficult puzzles award bonuses for speed. | Visual spatial processing and problem solving; visual motor construction | |
Matrix Reasoning | View an array of pictures with one missing square, and select the picture that fits the array from five options. | Nonverbal abstract problem solving, inductive reasoning | ||
Visual Puzzles | View a puzzle in a stimulus book and choose from among pieces of which three could construct the puzzle | Visual spatial reasoning | ||
Picture Completion | Select the missing part of a picture | Ability to quickly perceive visual details | ||
Figure Weights | View a stimulus book that pictures shapes on a scale (or scales) with one empty side and select the choice that keeps the scale balanced | Quantitative reasoning | ||
Working Memory | Digit Span | Listen to sequences of numbers orally and to repeat them as heard, in reverse order, and in ascending order. | Working memory, attention, encoding, auditory processing | |
Arithmetic | Orally administered arithmetic word problems. Timed. | Quantitative reasoning, concentration, mental manipulation | ||
Letter-Number Sequencing | Recall a series of numbers in increasing order and letters in alphabetical order. | Working memory, attention, mental control | ||
Processing Speed | Symbol Search | View rows of symbols and target symbols, and mark whether or not the target symbols appear in each row. | Processing speed | |
Coding | Transcribe a digit-symbol code using a key. The task is time-limited. | Processing speed, associative memory, graphomotor speed | ||
Cancellation | Scan arrangements of shapes and mark specific target shapes within a limited amount of time | Processing speed |
Standardization[edit]
The WAIS-IV was standardized on a sample of 2,200 people in the United States, ranging in age from 16 to 90.[10] The demographic characteristics of the sample were modeled after the proportions of different groups in an analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau. An extension of the standardization has been conducted with 688 Canadians in the same age range.
Age range and uses[edit]
The WAIS-IV measure is acceptable for use with people who are 16–90 years of age. For people younger than 16, the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI, 2½–7 years, 7 months) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC, 6–16 years) are used.[11]
Intelligence tests may be used to assess the level of cognitive functioning in individuals with psychiatric illness or brain injury. Rehabilitation psychologists and neuropsychologists use neuropsychological tests (including the WAIS-IV) to assess how the individual’s brain is functioning after it has been injured. Specific subtests can provide insight into specific cognitive functions; for example, the digit span subtest could be used to look for attentional difficulties.[11]
The Wechsler tests can also be used to identify intellectual giftedness, and are commonly accepted as qualifying evidence for high-IQ societies, such as Mensa, Intertel and the Triple Nine Society.[12][13][14]
/Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Wikipedia/
What is the WAIS-IV?
Often when a person is being assessed for academic or occupational difficulties, the WAIS-IV will be administered amidst a battery of psychological tests with similarly ambiguous acronyms. The aim of this article is to provide some clarity about the content and purpose of this commonly used assessment. The goal is to demystify part of the psychometric assessment process, which can be overwhelming at times.
Psychologists are often asked to administer the WAIS-IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Fourth Edition). The WAIS-IV is the “gold standard” in cognitive assessment and claims to measure intellectual performance. The importance of conceptualising intelligence as a performance variable is that it does not really matter how much intelligence an individual has, to adapt to the environment. What really matters is how well they use their intelligence. Since intellectual capacity cannot be seen nor concretely verified, it cannot be reliably measured. However, intellectual performance can be measured and thus, should be the focus of testing. Most other major intelligence tests, (e.g. Stanford-Binet; the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test; Guilford Intelligence Scales), also view intelligence tests as performance measures.
The WAIS-IV measures intellectual performance as a multidimensional construct. The test contains numerous scales (Indices) assessing qualitatively different types of intellectual functioning. Current intelligence tests view intelligence not as specific abilities emanating from a “general” intellectual capacity, but as different types of intelligence, each being of equal importance.
Apart from providing IQ scores, the WAIS-IV integrates current conceptualisations and recent research to provide the most essential information about a testee’s strengths and areas of difficulty. When being revised, there is a lot of input from practitioners and experts in the field. Over time and after several reviews, the WAIS-IV is concluded to represent significant advances in the understanding of cognitive abilities. The WAIS-IV contains 10 core subtests and 5 additional optional subtests. These are summed to four indexes:
- Verbal Comprehension Index,
- Perceptual Reasoning Index,
- Working Memory Index, and
- Processing Speed Index.
One Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) is also calculated. These scores range from the lowest (40) to the highest (160) points. Subtests are given for additional examination of processing abilities. The age range for the WISC-IV is 16 years to 90 years and 11 months.
WAIS-IV Indices (aka: indexes)
The following are the four main indices of the WAIS-IV and what they measure:
Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)
This Index assesses the testee’s ability to listen to a question, draw upon learned information from both formal and informal education, reason through an answer and express thoughts aloud. It can tap preferences for verbal information, a difficulty with novel and unexpected situations, or a desire for more time to process information rather than decide “on the spot.”
Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)
The PRI assesses the testee’s ability to examine a problem, draw upon visual-motor and visual-spatial skills, organise their thoughts, create solutions and then test them. It can also tap preferences for visual information, comfort with novel and unexpected situations or a preference to learn by doing.
Working Memory Index (WMI)
The WMI assesses the testee’s ability to memorise new information, hold it in short-term memory, concentrate, and manipulate information to produce some results. It is important in higher-order thinking, learning, and achievement. WMI can tap concentration, planning ability, cognitive flexibility, and sequencing skills, but is sensitive to anxiety. It is an important component of learning and achievement, and ability to work effectively with ideas as they are presented in classroom situations.
Processing Speed Index (PSI)
The PSI assesses the testee’s abilities to focus attention and quickly scan, discriminate between, and sequentially order visual information. It requires persistence and planning ability, but can be impacted by motivation, working under a time pressure, and motor coordination. Cultural factors seem to have little impact on PSI. It is related to reading performance and development too. PSI is related to Working Memory in that increased processing speed can decrease the amount of information a testee must “hold” in working memory.
As an analogy, one can think of the thinking brain like the front entrance to a Victorian style home. There is a porch, front door, a foyer and, of course, the rest of the house. Guests (information) knock at the door and “stand on the porch”(i.e., teacher presents concepts). The host (i.e., the brain) lets the “guest” come into the foyer (i.e., brain perceives the information and registers that it is there). The host helps guests take off their coats and boots (i.e., the brain organizes and clarifies the information for storage), and brings them into the house (i.e. encodes the information into longer term memory). If the host takes too long to perform “hosts tasks” and get the guests into the living room, some guests may become impatient and leave (i.e., some information is not encoded).
Finding Assistance
At Strategic Psychology in Canberra, we offer a comprehensive, individually-tailored assessment service that is suitable for children, adolescents and adults who are having difficulties with academic and work functioning. The WAIS-IV is just one of the numerous assessments our clinicians are trained to administer. If you would like to make an appointment for yourself or your child to discuss the possibility and usefulness of administering an assessment, please contact us on (02) 6262 6157 or email support@strategicpsychology.com.au.
Related reading:
How Do I Know if my Child has Learning Difficulties?
Applied Psychometrics 101: What does the WASI-IV Measure?
“None of the Above” What IQ Doesn’t tell you about race by Malcom Gladwell